Khartoum University main building established 1902

ERC Election meeting

RESEARCH ETHICS: BACKGROUND AND DEFINITION

RESEARCH ETHICS: BACKGROUND AND DEFINITION

Research ethics provides guidelines for the responsible conduct of biomedical research. In addition, research ethics educates and monitors scientists conducting research to ensure a high ethical standard.

BRIEF HISTORY

The birth of modern research ethics began with a desire to protect human subjects involved in research projects. The first attempt to craft regulations began during the Doctors Trial of 1946-1947.    

Read more: RESEARCH ETHICS: BACKGROUND AND DEFINITION

RESEARCH ETHICS: BACKGROUND AND DEFINITION

SEARCH ETHIRECS BACKGROUND AND DEFINITION

Research ethics provides guidelines for the responsible conduct of biomedical research. In addition, research ethics educates and monitors scientists conducting research to ensure a high ethical standard.

 Read more

ERC secretary message

ERC secretary message

 

Dr.Faiza Mohamed Osman

Dear Visitors
You are Welcome to our Website

One of the main objectives of the institute of endemic diseases at the University of Khartoum is to undertake research in the major endemic diseases in the Sudan and train professionals in different fields including biochemical research.

Read more: ERC secretary message

RESEARCH WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS

RESEARCH WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS

The issues concerning research with human subjects involve topics ranging from voluntary participation in research to fair selection and justice. This variety makes the topics surrounding research ethics with human subjects a challenging but important charge.

Readmore

 

Scientific and ethical reviews

Scientific and ethical reviews

All proposals to conduct research involving human subjects must be submitted for review of their scientific merit and ethical acceptability to one or more scientific review and ethical review committees. The review committees must be independent of the research team, and any direct financial or other material benefit they may derive from the research should not be dependent on the outcome of their review.
The investigator must obtain their approval or clearance before undertaking the research. The ethical review committee should conduct further reviews as necessary in the course of the research, including monitoring of the progress of the study.

Readmre

 

The ethics review flowchart

How should I submit my project for review?

You need to complete an ethics application form (Request for Ethics Approval form ) and submit it with any supporting documentation – such as  the scientific committee approval  and consent forms.. You should discuss your ethics application with your supervisor who will decide if it is low risk or potentially high risk, and advise you how to submit for review accordingly. The standard ethics application form and other forms can be found and downloaded at this website

Readmore

 

Student Corner

Scientific and ethical reviews

Scientific and ethical reviews

All proposals to conduct research involving human subjects must be submitted for review of their scientific merit and ethical acceptability to one or more scientific review and ethical review committees. The review committees must be independent of the research team, and any direct financial or other material benefit they may derive from the research should not be dependent on the outcome of their review.
The investigator must obtain their approval or clearance before undertaking the research. The ethical review committee should conduct further reviews as necessary in the course of the research, including monitoring of the progress of the study.

Ethical review committees may function at the institutional, local, regional, or national level, and in some cases at the international level. The regulatory or other governmental authorities concerned should promote uniform standards across committees within a country, and, under all systems, sponsors of research and institutions in which the investigators are employed should allocate sufficient resources to the review process.
Ethical review committees may receive money for the activity of reviewing protocols, but under no circumstances may payment be offered or accepted for a review committee`s approval or clearance of a protocol.

Scientific review: According to the Declaration of Helsinki (Paragraph 11), medical research involving humans must conform to generally accepted scientific principles, and be based on a thorough knowledge of the scientific literature, other relevant sources of information, and adequate laboratory and, where indicated, animal experimentation.
Scientific review must consider, inter alia, the study design, including the provisions for avoiding or minimizing risk and for monitoring safety. Committees competent to review and approve scientific aspects of research proposals must be multidisciplinary.
Ethical review:  The ethical review committee is responsible for safeguarding the rights, safety, and well-being of the research subjects. Scientific review and ethical review cannot be separated: scientifically unsound research involving humans as subjects is ipso facto unethical in that it may expose them to risk or inconvenience to no purpose; even if there is no risk of injury, wasting of subjects` and researchers` time in unproductive activities represents loss of a valuable resource. Normally, therefore, an ethical review committee considers both the scientific and the ethical aspects of proposed research. It must either carry out a proper scientific review or verify that a competent expert body has determined that the research is scientifically sound. Also, it considers provisions for monitoring of data and safety.
If the ethical review committee finds a research proposal scientifically sound, or verifies that a competent expert body has found it so, it should then consider whether any known or possible risks to the subjects are justified by the expected benefits, direct or indirect, and whether the proposed research methods will minimize harm and maximize benefit.
If the proposal is sound and the balance of risks to anticipated benefits is reasonable, the committee should then determine whether the procedures proposed for obtaining informed consent are satisfactory and those proposed for the selection of subjects are equitable.

Source: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) : International Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical Research Involving Human
Subjects